Editorial Policies

Focus and Scope

Jurnal Ilmu Manajemen publish papers in the field of management science that give contribution to the development of management science, and management practices. We accept mainly research-based articles related to management science. The scopes of the topics include :

1) Financial Management

2) Marketing Management

3) Human Resource Management.

 

Section Policies

Articles

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Cover dan Daftar Isi

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed
 

Peer Review Process

In the reviewing process, there are at least two reviewers for each manuscript in the related topic. Four weeks will be needed for reviewer to complete one round reviewing process.

Generally, the candidate of reviewers will be chosen based on their reputation in the international publication number and quality. Next step, The Editor send the invitation letter for each candidate of reviewer. After the candidate of reviewer informed their availabilities for reviewing process, Editor create account for each reviewer and then send manuscript by OJS.

All reviewing process are in blind review and managed by editor in the OJS

 

Open Access Policy

This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.

 

Archiving

This journal utilizes the LOCKSS system to create a distributed archiving system among participating libraries and permits those libraries to create permanent archives of the journal for purposes of preservation and restoration. More...

 

Publications Ethics

Jurnal Ilmu Manajemen follows the guidelines set out by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) in all aspects of publication ethics, in particular, protocols of research and publication misconduct. Jurnal Ilmu Manajemen adheres to the COPE guidelines that ensure high quality standard of ethics for authors, editors, and reviewers:

Authors

  1. Authors attest that the material has not been previously published and that they have not transferred any rights to the article to another party.
  2. Authors should ensure the originality of their work and must properly cite others work in accordance with the approved references format.
  3. Authors should not engage in plagiarism or self-plagiarism.
  4. An author should not in general publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one journal or primary publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable.
  5. Authors should make all data and details of their work available to the editors if there are suspicions of data falsification or fabrication.
  6. Authors of the article should clarify any possible conflicts of interest such as their job role, research expenses, consultant expenses, and intellectual property.
  7. When an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in his/her own published work, it is the author's obligation to promptly notify the journal editor or publisher and cooperate with the editor to retract or correct the paper.

 

Editors

  1. Editors are responsible for every article published in Jurnal Ilmu Manajemen.
  2. Editors should assist authors, where possible, to ensure their articles adhere to Jurnal Ilmu Manajemen guidelines.
  3. Editors may confer with other editors or reviewers when making final decisions regarding publication.
  4. An editor must evaluate manuscripts objectively for publication; judging each on its merit without bias towards nationality, ethnicity, political beliefs, race, religion, gender, seniority, or institutional affiliation of the authors.
  5. Editors should decline articles if there is a potential conflict of interest. 
  6. Editors must ensure that documents sent to reviewers do not contain private information of the authors and vice versa. 
  7. The editor's final decision should be relayed to authors in a timely fashion and will be accompanied by the reviewer's comments, unless they contain offensive or libelous remarks. 
  8. If authors have a well-reasoned objection to a certain individual reviewing their work, editors should respect this request. 
  9. Editors and all staff should guarantee the confidentiality of the submitted manuscript.
  10. Editors will be guided by the COPE guidelines if there is a suspected misconduct or disputed authorship.

 

Reviewers

  1. Reviewers are required to comment on possible research, ethical, and publication misconduct if they are suspected. 
  2. Reviews should be conducted objectively. Personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Referees should express their views clearly with supporting arguments.
  3. Reviewers must complete the work in a timely manner and should notify the editor immediately if they cannot complete the work.
  4. Reviewers are to respect the confidentiality of the manuscript. 
  5. Reviewers should not accept manuscripts for assessment if they believe there is a potential conflict of interest between them and any of the authors.
  6. A reviewer should call to the editor's attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge.
  7. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.

 

Malpractice Statement

Publication Ethics and Publication Malpractice Statement

(Based on Elsevier recommendations and COPE's Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors)

Ethical guidelines for journal publication

The publication of an article in the peer-reviewed journals published by Program Studi Manajemen Pascasarjana Universitas Muhammadiyah Palembang is the process of permanent knowledge improvement. It is a direct reflection of the quality of the work of the authors and the institutions that support them. Peer-reviewed articles support and embody the scientific method. It is therefore important to agree upon standards of expected ethical behavior for all parties involved in the act of publishing: the author, the journal editor, the peer reviewer, the publisher, and the society of society-owned or sponsored journals.

Program Studi Manajemen Pascasarjana Universitas Muhammadiyah Palembang takes their duties of guardianship over all stages of publishing extremely seriously and we recognize our ethical and other responsibilities.

We are committed to ensuring that advertising, reprint or other commercial revenue has no impact or influence on editorial decisions. In addition, the Editorial Board will assist in communications with other journals and/or publishers where this is useful to editors.

Duties of authors

Reporting standards

Authors of reports of original research should present an accurate account of the work performed as well as an objective discussion of its significance. Underlying data should be represented accurately in the paper. A paper should contain sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the work. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review and professional publication articles should also be accurate and objective, and editorial 'opinion' works should be clearly identified as such.

Data access and retention

Authors may be asked to provide the raw data in connection with a paper for editorial review, and should, in any event, be prepared to retain such data for a reasonable time after publication.

Originality and plagiarism

The authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works, and if the authors have used the work and/or words of others, that this has been appropriately cited or quoted. Plagiarism takes many forms, from 'passing off' another's paper as the author's own paper, to copying or paraphrasing substantial parts of another's paper (without attribution), to claiming results from research conducted by others. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable.

Multiple, redundant or concurrent publication

An author should not in general publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one journal or primary publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. In general, an author should not submit for consideration in another journal a previously published paper.

Acknowledgment of sources

Proper acknowledgment of the work of others must always be given. Authors should cite publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the reported work. Information obtained privately, as in conversation, correspondence, or discussion with third parties, must not be used or reported without explicit, written permission from the source. Information obtained in the course of confidential services, such as refereeing manuscripts or grant applications, must not be used without the explicit written permission of the author of the work involved in these services.

Authorship of the paper

Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the reported study. All those who have made significant contributions should be listed as co-authors. Where there are others who have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project, they should be acknowledged or listed as contributors. The corresponding author should ensure that all co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the paper and have agreed to its submission for publication.

Hazards and human or animal subjects

If the work involves chemicals, procedures, or equipment that have any unusual hazards inherent in their use, the author must clearly identify these in the manuscript. If the work involves the use of animal or human subjects, the author should ensure that the manuscript contains a statement that all procedures were performed in compliance with relevant laws and institutional guidelines and that the appropriate institutional committee(s) has approved them. The authors should include a statement in the manuscript that informed consent was obtained for experimentation with human subjects. The privacy rights of human subjects must always be observed.

Disclosure and conflicts of interest

All authors should disclose in their manuscript any financial or other substantive conflicts of interest that might be construed to influence the results or interpretation of their manuscript. All sources of financial support for the project should be disclosed. Examples of potential conflicts of interest that should be disclosed include employment, consultancies, stock ownership, honoraria, paid expert testimony, patent applications/registrations, and grants or other funding. Potential conflicts of interest should be disclosed at the earliest stage possible.

Fundamental errors in published works

When an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in his/her own published work, it is the author's obligation to promptly notify the journal editor or publisher and cooperate with the editor to retract or correct the paper. If the editor or the publisher learns from a third party that a published work contains a significant error, it is the obligation of the author to promptly retract or correct the paper or provide evidence to the editor of the correctness of the original paper.

Duties of editors

Publication decisions

The editor of a peer-reviewed journal is responsible for deciding which of the articles submitted to the journal should be published, often working in conjunction with the relevant society (for society-owned or sponsored journals). The validation of the work in question and its importance to researchers and readers must always drive such decisions. The editor may be guided by the policies of the journal's editorial board and constrained by such legal requirements as shall then be in force regarding libel, copyright infringement and plagiarism. The editor may confer with other editors or reviewers (or society officers) in making this decision.

Fair play

An editor should evaluate manuscripts for their intellectual content without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors.

Confidentiality

The editor and any editorial staff must not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher, as appropriate.

Disclosure and conflicts of interest

Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in an editor's own research without the express written consent of the author. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Editors should recuse themselves (i.e. should ask a co-editor, associate editor or other members of the editorial board instead to review and consider) from considering manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or (possibly) institutions connected to the papers. Editors should require all contributors to disclose relevant competing interests and publish corrections if competing interests.

 

Plagiarism Screening

Before going to the review process, all manuscripts will be checked that they are free from plagiarism practice using "Plagiarism Checker X" software. If there an indication of plagiarism, the manuscript will instantly be rejected.

 

Copyright Transfer Agreement

Authors who publish their articles in Jurnal Ilmu Manajemen agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors grant the copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors can enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal. copyright and originality, download in here
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) before and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work
 
Creative Commons License
Jurnal Ilmu Manajemen is published by Pascasarjana Management Department. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.


 

Article Processing Charge

This journal charges the following author fees.

Article Submission FEE: 0.00 (IDR)

Fast-Track Review FEE: 750.000.00 (IDR)

Article Publication FEE: 350.000.00 (IDR)

 

Review Guidelines

manuscripts submitted to Jurnal Ilmu Manajemen will undergo a blind review process. The reviewers are tasked to carry out reviews that include analyses and assessments of manuscripts’ acceptability to be published in Jurnal Ilmu Manajemen. Reviewers should consider the following points prior to conducting their review:

  1. Does the manuscript you are being asked to review match your expertise? (If the article does not sufficiently match your area of expertise, please notify the Editors.)
  2. Do you have time to review the manuscript? (The review process should be completed within 2 weeks after a manuscript has been sent. If you do not agree with this condition and need more time to review, please contact the Editors.)
  3. Are there any conflicts of interest with the manuscript? (If you have any conflicts of interests with the manuscript, please contact the Editors)
  4. Are there any indications of plagiarism in the manuscript? (If you suspect any indications of plagiarism in the manuscript, please contact the Editors immediately.)

 

Review Process

The peer reviewer is responsible for critiquing by reading and evaluating manuscripts in the field of expertise, then giving constructive advice and honest feedback to the author of the article submitted. Peer reviewers, discuss the strengths and weaknesses of the article, how to increase the strength and quality of the paper, and evaluate the relevance and authenticity of the manuscript.

Title: describe the article clearly? (provide comments and recommendations)

Abstract: describe the contents of the article? (provide comments and recommendations)

Introduction: does this describe the accuracy of the problem raised by the author and clearly state the problem under consideration? (provide comments and recommendations)

Literature Review: do the authors use references no longer than 5 years (secondary sources) or 10 years (primary sources)? (provide comments and recommendations)

Method: the author accurately describes how the data is collected? (provide comments and recommendations)

Method: is there a suitable sampling? (provide comments and recommendations)

Method: does the exposure of the article describe what type of data is recorded; correct in describing measurements? (provide comments and recommendations)

Research Results: has the author explained his findings? (provide comments and recommendations)

Research Results: Have the authors explained their findings in an orderly and logical manner? (provide comments and recommendations)

research results: the author has used the appropriate statistical tools? (provide comments and recommendations)

Discussion: is the author's explanation supported by the results of the research correctly? (provide comments and recommendations)

Discussion: The author compares the results of his research with previous studies? (provide comments and recommendations)

Conclusion: the author explains the results of scientific research better. (provide comments and recommendations)

Bibliography: all references written on the contents have been included in the bibliography? (provide comments and recommendations)

Bibliography: written using APA format? (provide comments and recommendations)

Bibliography: writing a bibliography using the citation application? (provide comments and recommendations)



Final Review:

  1. Assessment of the manuscript review should be written in the Review Form sent by the Editorial Secretary;
  2. Reviewers are required to fill in the table marked with asterisks.
  3. At the end of the review, reviewers are required to give one of the following recommendations:
  4. Accepted; means that the manuscript is acceptable for publication
  5. Accepted with minor revisions; means that the manuscript is acceptable for publication once it is revised in response to the reviewer's concerns
  6. Accepted with major revisions; means that substantive inadequacies in the manuscript, such as data analysis, the main theory used, and rewriting of paragraphs, need to be revised
  7. Rejected; means that the manuscript is not acceptable for publication or the given reviews relate to very basic issues
  8. Upon completion of the review form, please fill in the reviewer’s identity in the corresponding columns.