Farnia Sari, Sri Wahyuni


Writing process involves thinking and creative skills. To stimulate the students’ thoughts to express their ideas, clustering technique is effective brainstorming activity to help the students explore their ideas and write consistently. Thus, the objective of this study is to find out whether or not there is any significant difference between the students who were taught in writing descriptive paragraph through Clustering Technique and those who were not. The population of this study was all of the eighth grade students of SMP Srijaya Negara Palembang in academic year 2016/2017. There were three classes that consist of 113 students. The samples of this study were VIII C as a control group and VIII B as an experimental group. This study was conducted by using quasi experimental method with nonequivalent control group design. Then, the data were analyzed by using paired sample t-test and independent sample t-test. The result of independent sample t-test shows that the value of sig. (2-tailed) was 0.00 < 0.05 in the level of significant 0.05. While, the value of t-obtained was 5.213 higher than the critical value of t-table was 1.665 with degree of freedom 76. It can be concluded that the null hypothesis was rejected and the alternative hypothesis was accepted. It means that there was any significant difference between the students who were taught in writing descriptive paragraph through Clustering Technique and those who were not.


writing achievement; descriptive text; clustering technique.

Full Text:



Barly, B. (1995). Write well: Improving writing skills. Yogyakarta: Kanisius.

Baroudy, I. (2008). A Procedural Approach to Process Theory of Writing: Prewriting Techniques.

The International Journal of Language Society and Culture. 24 (4). 45-52.

Brown, H.D. (2004). Language assessment: Principles and classroom practices. New York, USA: Pearson Education.

Brown, H.D. (2007). Teaching by principles: An interactive approach to language pedagogy (2nd ed.). New York: Addison Wesley Longman.

Harmer, J. (2007). The practice of English language teaching (4thEd). New York: Pearson Longman.

Ismail, Sadiq, A.W.A. (2011). Exploring students perceptions of ESL writing. English Language. Teaching. 4 (2). 73-83. DOI: 10.5539/elt.v4n2p73.

Langan, J. (2006). English skill with readings (6thed). New York: McGraw-Hill.

Mayer, P. (2011). Cresl Level Four Writing Guide. New York: Learning Express.

Miranda, N. (2003). Non-native English Speaking Teachers’ Continuous

Improvement: A Double Challenge.Nestnewsletter, 5(1), 1-4.



  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2018 English Community Journal

The Departement of English Education, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Muhammadiyah Palembang

Jl. Jenderal A. Yani 13 Ulu, Seberang Ulu II, Palembang (30263), Indonesia.

Indexed by :


English Community Journal has been listed in :


Creative Commons License
English Community Journal by is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.